Industrial AI practice  ·  Gulf  ·  Arabic and English Reply within one working day
Document extraction

A Gulf public health ministry

Healthcare / Government · Gulf

← All documented proof

The shape of this problem

A human reads it and types it in again

The problem

Teams needed to convert paper and scanned records into structured data. Health records on paper cannot be queried, audited, or linked to anything - the information exists but is unavailable to every downstream system that needs it. The scans are also not uniform: form layouts vary, quality varies, and handwriting turns up exactly where it is least convenient, so a fixed-template extractor fails on precisely the documents that matter most.

What we built

We used vision models to segment pages, extract text, preserve each value's location on the page, itemize fields, and prepare the outputs for downstream processing.

What moved

Measure Before After
Handling time per record 18 minutes ~2.5 minutes
Extraction accuracy not measured 96% clean digital forms / 84% poor scans / 61% handwritten entries
Fields routed to human review with their source region highlighted not measured 14%

Handling time per record

Before 18 minutes After ~2.5 minutes

Fields routed to human review with their source region highlighted

14%

14%

Fields routed to human review with their source region highlighted

The ring is the whole of that measure. The grey arc is the other 86%.

Figures are drawn from the practice's own delivery records for the engagement named, measured against the process that preceded it. They have not been through third-party audit, and none is presented as an average across clients.

What it turned on

Preserving where a value was found, not just the value, is what makes a low-confidence field reviewable - the reviewer is shown the source region instead of having to re-read the document. Relevant to any organisation whose paper archive is the reason a digital system still runs on manual entry.

Service line
AI Document Intelligence
The proof is telecom and financial-services documents, not a construction subcontractor invoice. The machinery is identical; say which it was.

Start here

Which of the four is yours?

Tell us the documents and the monthly volume and we will send the two closest records, with the proof behind each and the honest note where the match is partial.

You get a reply within one working day, from the engineer who would do the work - not a sales sequence.