A Gulf telecom operator's finance function - Multimodal invoice validation
Telecommunications / Finance · Gulf
The shape of this problem
A human reads it and types it in again
The problem
AP teams were manually comparing supplier PDFs, iSupplier entries, and Oracle ERP records. Three-way matching is the kind of work that is too rule-bound to be interesting and too variable to script: the same supplier's invoice arrives in a different layout each quarter, and the discrepancies that matter are small ones buried among formatting differences that do not. Because the check was manual it was also quietly sampled under load - which is exactly when errors are most likely.
What we built
We used a multimodal vision model and a managed model platform to extract invoice fields, reconcile all three sources, flag mismatches, and support correction notifications back to the supplier.
What moved
| Measure | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Invoices reconciled across supplier PDF, iSupplier and ERP | a sample under load | 100% |
| Average validation time per invoice | 12 minutes | 45 seconds |
| Repeat mismatches from the same supplier after correction notices | † | down 67% |
† Measured against the prior level of the same measure.
Average validation time per invoice
Repeat mismatches from the same supplier after correction notices
Measured against the client's own prior process, indexed to 100. The source publishes the size of the movement, not the absolute figure it moved from.
Figures are from the practice's own delivery records for the engagement named, measured against the process that preceded it.
What it turned on
Closing the loop back to the supplier is what stopped the same mismatch recurring every month - detection alone would have relocated the work rather than removed it. Relevant to finance operations whose control is technically three-way matching and practically a sample.
- Service line
- AI Document Intelligence
Start here
Which of the four is yours?
Tell us the documents and the monthly volume and we will send the two closest records, with the figures behind each and what it would take to repeat them on your material.
You get a reply within one working day, from the engineer who would do the work.